There is actually no clear-cut interpretation of an intelligent building due to existing diverse structural configurations expedient on the geographical locale. However, a prevailing template is the presence of an amalgam of state-of-the-art technologies and interdependent systems that sustain not only the security of the architecture and its residents but also facilitate cost-effective and economical operations as well as spatial flexibility to respond to various functions. The Intelligent Buildings Institute pinpointed four basic elements: the interconnectedness of structure, systems, services, and management. The confluence of the systems network and the infrastructure, which is achieved via the use of a common cabling or wireless systems, manages the edifice’s surroundings and circumstances as well as its enterprise. Thus, there are adaptable workplaces that can be used more efficiently, accessibility to control and security systems that monitor activities and occupancy, and residents’ means to facilities and technology tools.
Image source: commscope.com
The integration of systems leads to reduced costs and enhances efficiency in energy consumption especially if there are energy-saving measures installed as well. Most important is the maintenance of a comfortable and secure environment that paves the way to improved productivity.
Although the benefits, convenience, and comfort offered by intelligent buildings are beyond disputable arguments, the infrastructure’s reliance on technology for sustenance is not without the associated risks. For the last two decades, the digital and IT world have been subjected to various perils and menaces. Intelligent buildings run on sophisticated systems. Thus, it is not inconceivable that the application of converged infrastructure, as well as the assimilation of building and operational systems, can engender novel varieties of threats that could be aimed at the human resources, technology, and operations. To illustrate, there could be instances, whether deliberately or inadvertently, entrants may opt to ignore security controls or inaccurately operate the systems. The more complex the integration of systems, the higher is the probability of errors or omissions, and more damaging the consequences. Likewise, systems integration gathers various experts who may have disparate concerns, preferences, cultures, and administrative chains of command that can hinder immediate and timely response to systems flaws and failures.
Unfortunately, the manpower complement of the building has the greatest probability to bear the bigger risks. There is urgency to set up pertinent and opportune measures to ensure the safety and protection of the occupants as well as the structure.
Reddy Kancharla has extensive knowledge of engineering theories, principles, and practical solutions of engineering problems relating to civil engineering and the construction industry, and the development of quality systems in the construction industry per various codes and standards. He has more than 25 years of experience in projects involving civil construction, geotechnical consultation, and construction QA/QC. For more reads on civil engineering, click here.
